The Week Did Not Wait
I stepped away from publishing to start a demanding new package-delivery job. The news did not slow down. Here are 10 major stories from inside the United States and 10 from beyond it that deserve more than a disappearing headline.
First, I owe readers an explanation.
I did not stop caring about the work.
I did not run out of stories.
I started a demanding new job delivering packages.
I am not naming the company yet. I may eventually write about the experience, the workload, the pressure, the surveillance, the routes, the expectations, and what the job reveals about modern labor. For now, I need time to understand it before turning it into an article.
The truth is that I have not been able to make this publication my full-time work yet.
That is why paid subscriptions matter so much.
I am currently at 324 paid subscribers.
Tonight’s goal is 330.
We need six more paid subscribers to reach it.
If you can afford to support this work, I genuinely need the help more than ever right now. Paid support gives me more time to investigate, write, verify, and publish instead of trying to fit the work around exhausting shifts.
This article is fully free.
It covers 20 major developments from July 10 through July 18: war, elections, immigration enforcement, congressional succession, inflation, wildfire smoke, Ukraine, China, Venezuela, Cuba, Ebola, and several stories that disappeared beneath the louder headlines.
I will be posting much more over the coming days to make up for the gap.
Now, start with what happened while the inbox was quiet.
TEN MAJOR STORIES INSIDE THE UNITED STATES
1. The Iran war widened—and Americans were killed
The United States has now carried out seven consecutive nights of strikes against Iran.
On Saturday, the U.S. military said two American service members were killed in Jordan and another was missing following an Iranian attack. Iran also renewed attacks against U.S. allies across the Gulf after American strikes hit bridges, power infrastructure, air defenses, surveillance assets, missile sites, and other targets.
This is no longer a contained exchange over commercial shipping.
It is a widening regional conflict involving U.S. casualties, military bases across several countries, civilian infrastructure, oil routes, and retaliatory attacks that can pull more governments into the war.
The administration previously presented ceasefires and agreements as off-ramps. The current pattern looks more like escalation with temporary pauses between rounds.
The most important unanswered questions remain basic:
What is the legal authorization?
What is the achievable military objective?
What event ends the bombing?
How many American troops and civilians have been killed or injured?
How much is the war costing?
And what happens if Iran’s next attack kills far more Americans?
2. Lindsey Graham died—and the seat moved to his sister
Sen. Lindsey Graham died unexpectedly on July 11 at age 71.
Within three days, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster appointed Graham’s younger sister, Darline Graham, to serve through the end of his term. She became the first woman to represent South Carolina in the Senate.
Then the temporary succession began looking less temporary.
Donald Trump publicly urged Darline to seek the full six-year term and promised his complete endorsement if she enters the race.
That changed the story from a memorial appointment into a possible political inheritance.
Darline has her own public-service record, particularly in disability and workforce programs. But she entered the Senate without winning a statewide election and could now enter the Republican primary as a sitting senator carrying her brother’s name, network, legislative priorities, and Trump’s endorsement.
The appointment was legal.
The broader question remains:
Should an emergency appointment provide the platform from which a family member permanently inherits political power?
3. Mitch McConnell remains absent, with no return date
Mitch McConnell has remained away from Senate floor votes after a June 14 fall that briefly left him unconscious.
McConnell, 84, later disclosed that he developed pneumonia while hospitalized and moved to a rehabilitation facility for physical therapy and fall-prevention work. He says he remains engaged with staff and intends to finish his term, but he has not announced a date for returning to the chamber.
His absence is not merely personal.
Kentucky effectively has only one senator participating in floor votes while major decisions involving war, appropriations, national security, surveillance, and executive appointments move through Congress.
Staff can brief a senator.
Staff can communicate instructions.
Staff cannot cast a senator’s vote.
McConnell’s case, alongside Graham’s sudden death, has intensified demands for a rule requiring lawmakers to disclose whether they can perform official duties after prolonged absences—without forcing them to publish private diagnoses.
The problem is not illness.
It is representation disappearing behind vague office statements.
4. Trump removed the officials who help oversee election systems
On July 9, Trump dismissed the remaining members of the bipartisan Election Assistance Commission, leaving the federal agency’s future uncertain only months before the November midterms.
The commission helps election officials, certifies voting systems, distributes election-security resources, and maintains the national voter-registration form.
The firings did not happen in isolation.
The Justice Department also sent warnings to all 50 states saying election officials could face criminal prosecution for permitting ineligible noncitizens to remain on voter rolls. Trump has continued pressing for federal voter-ID and citizenship rules while framing election administration as a national-security concern.
Supporters call this overdue enforcement.
Critics see a federal attempt to pressure state and local election administrators, replace independent officials, and place more election machinery under presidential control.
The crucial distinction is between protecting elections and controlling the people who certify them.
The administration should publish the evidence behind its warnings, the standards it expects states to meet, and its plan for replacing the dismissed commissioners before the midterms.
5. An ICE agent killed a man who was not the target
An ICE agent fatally shot 26-year-old Colombian national Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Biddeford, Maine, during an immigration operation.
Officials initially described the encounter as targeted enforcement involving a person with a final removal order. Maine Sen. Angus King later said Homeland Security officials informed him that the man killed was not the target of the warrant officers were attempting to execute.
The shooting was the second fatal use of force by ICE within one week and part of a larger pattern of deaths connected to immigration operations.
The administration ordered ICE to suspend most vehicle stops after the shootings, but Trump publicly insisted the agency should continue using traffic stops as an enforcement tool.
That contradiction matters.
One part of the government recognized an operational danger.
The president demanded the tactic continue.
The investigation now needs to answer who the intended target was, why Guerrero was stopped, what threat the officer perceived, how many shots were fired, and whether agents followed policy.
6. The legal status of roughly 600,000 Venezuelans is back before the Supreme Court
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn a lower-court ruling that found its termination of Temporary Protected Status for approximately 600,000 Venezuelans unlawful.
TPS permits eligible nationals of countries facing war, disaster, or extraordinary instability to live and work legally in the United States for a temporary period.
The administration argues it has broad authority to end the protections.
Immigrant advocates argue the termination was rushed, discriminatory, and unlawful.
The stakes extend beyond one immigration program.
A decision favoring the administration could strengthen presidential power to revoke humanitarian protections with limited judicial interference, even when hundreds of thousands of people have built families, careers, and communities under legal status granted by the federal government.
A decision against the administration could restrict executive discretion and require a more transparent process.
The immediate question is whether 600,000 people remain legally protected.
The larger question is how temporary protection becomes permanent vulnerability.
7. A judge voided Trump’s IRS settlement and referred lawyers for possible discipline
A federal judge found that Trump misused the court system in litigation against the IRS and voided a settlement that could have provided extraordinary personal and political benefits.
The disputed arrangement reportedly included broad tax protections for Trump and his businesses and attempted to create a $1.8 billion fund for people claiming government “weaponization.”
Judge Kathleen Williams concluded that the settlement had not resulted from a normal adversarial process and referred attorneys involved—including government lawyers—to disciplinary authorities.
This is one of the most consequential stories of the week because it involves a president’s personal legal interests, the Justice Department, tax enforcement, and an attempted settlement involving enormous public consequences.
The question is not only whether Trump suffered an unlawful tax-data leak.
It is whether government lawyers negotiated with the president’s private attorneys as genuine representatives of the public—or as participants trying to produce a politically useful outcome.
The judge’s answer was severe enough to trigger professional-conduct referrals.
8. Trump fired a court-appointed federal prosecutor less than an hour after he was sworn in
Federal judges in Washington state appointed Roger Rogoff to serve as U.S. attorney in Seattle after the office had gone years without a Senate-confirmed leader.
Less than an hour after Rogoff was sworn in, Trump fired him.
Federal law allows district judges to appoint a prosecutor when an interim appointment expires without a permanent replacement. The administration argues that the president still retains removal authority. Rogoff is considering legal action.
This may sound like an obscure personnel dispute.
It is not.
U.S. attorneys control federal prosecutions, public-corruption cases, national-security investigations, civil enforcement, and decisions affecting thousands of defendants.
The conflict asks who controls a prosecutor’s office when the White House has failed to secure Senate confirmation:
The judges using statutory appointment power?
Or the president using executive removal power?
The answer could determine whether judicial appointments provide real independence—or only a temporary title that disappears as soon as the White House objects.
9. Inflation finally cooled—but the relief remains fragile
Consumer prices fell 0.4% from May to June, the largest monthly decline in four years.
Annual inflation slowed to 3.5%, down from 4.2% in May. Core inflation also cooled more than expected, weakening the argument for an immediate Federal Reserve rate increase.
That is genuine relief.
Gas, clothing, and used-car prices helped pull the overall number down.
But 3.5% inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, and the Iran war can quickly reverse the improvement if oil, shipping, insurance, or fertilizer costs rise.
The economy is therefore trapped between two realities.
The data improved.
The geopolitical risk worsened.
Consumers may see temporary relief at the pump while remaining squeezed by housing, health care, insurance, food, debt, and interest rates.
One favorable inflation report does not settle the affordability crisis.
It gives households room to breathe while Washington waits to see whether war closes the window again.
10. America faced smoke, fire, and flooding at the same time
More than 100 million people were placed under air-quality alerts as wildfire smoke from Canada and northern Minnesota spread across the Midwest, Northeast, and Mid-Atlantic.
At the same time, dozens of large wildfires burned across Western states while catastrophic flooding hit Texas.
Reuters reported 68 large fires active across 15 states, more than 17,000 personnel assigned to firefighting, and rainfall totals exceeding 27 inches in parts of Texas Hill Country.
The overlap is the story.
One part of the country was breathing smoke produced hundreds of miles away.
Another was fighting fires.
Another was underwater.
Major League Baseball games were postponed. Washington disappeared beneath haze. Health officials urged vulnerable people to remain indoors. The World Cup final in New Jersey faced air-quality concerns before forecasts suggested storms would clear much of the smoke.
This was not one disaster.
It was a continental system under simultaneous pressure.
TEN MAJOR STORIES BEYOND THE UNITED STATES
1. The Strait of Hormuz became a threat to global energy security
The Iran war’s most important battlefield may not be a city or military base.
It may be a narrow shipping passage.
The Strait of Hormuz normally carries roughly one-fifth of global energy shipments. The International Energy Agency warned that global energy security will be at risk if the route does not reopen within weeks.
Emergency reserve releases and higher U.S. production have prevented an immediate price explosion, but those measures are temporary.
Asian importers are particularly exposed.
Countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India rely heavily on energy moving through the strait. Higher fuel costs can force poorer households toward dangerous alternatives such as wood, charcoal, or animal waste, increasing indoor air pollution and health risks.
This is why Hormuz is more than an oil-market story.
It connects American military decisions to electricity, cooking fuel, transportation, food prices, public health, and political stability across entire regions.
2. Europe and Ukraine formed a new missile-defense coalition
Ukraine and nine European countries announced a coalition to build a shared defense against ballistic missiles.
The participating countries include Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
The plan aims to use Ukraine’s wartime experience to develop lower-cost, mass-produced defensive systems that could become operational far faster than traditional military procurement allows.
This is a major strategic shift.
Europe is no longer only sending weapons into Ukraine.
It is beginning to treat Ukraine as a source of technology, battlefield knowledge, and defense-industrial expertise.
Russia responded by warning that foreign forces deployed in Ukraine after any peace agreement would be considered legitimate military targets.
That means even the architecture intended to protect a future peace could become the basis for another confrontation.
Europe is preparing for the possibility that the war ends without the danger ending.
3. Peace talks stalled while Ukraine struck Russia’s shipping network
The Kremlin said there was no immediate prospect of restarting peace talks with Ukraine.
At the same time, Ukraine intensified drone attacks against Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov, a route used for a substantial share of Russia’s grain exports.
Ukraine said its drones struck 11 vessels in one overnight operation and more than 100 vessels over roughly nine days. Russia called the campaign terrorism and began examining ways to reroute grain shipments.
This is not merely a battlefield development.
It is an attempt to move economic pressure onto shipping, exports, insurance, ports, and supply chains.
Russia has used infrastructure attacks to weaken Ukraine.
Ukraine is increasingly targeting the infrastructure that allows Russia to finance and sustain the war.
The fighting is moving outward from trenches and cities into ports, tanker routes, cargo vessels, and trade corridors.
The absence of negotiations means each side is trying to improve its position before talks that neither currently expects soon.
4. Zelensky’s government shake-up unsettled Ukraine’s European backers
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky carried out a major cabinet reshuffle that removed Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov.
Fedorov, 35, had been associated with Ukraine’s rapid development of drone and digital-warfare systems. His removal prompted public demonstrations and questions from European governments about corruption reform, procurement, military innovation, and the management of billions in wartime aid.
The European Union has become Ukraine’s principal financial supporter after U.S. aid diminished, committing enormous sums since Russia’s invasion.
That creates a difficult balance.
Ukraine is sovereign and must choose its own leadership.
European taxpayers and governments also want evidence that wartime funds are being used effectively and that reformers are not being removed for political reasons.
The reshuffle may prove strategically justified.
The problem is that allies do not yet understand the strategy.
5. China’s economy slowed to its weakest pace in three and a half years
China’s economy grew 4.3% in the second quarter, below the government’s target range and the slowest pace in approximately three and a half years.
The weakness is concentrated where ordinary people feel it:
Household consumption remains weak.
Wages are under pressure.
Retail sales grew only 1% in June.
Property investment fell sharply.
Local governments remain burdened by debt.
Exports and industrial production are still strong, particularly because of global demand tied to artificial intelligence and technology. But that creates an increasingly unbalanced economy: factories and exports moving faster than households and domestic demand.
China matters far beyond China.
A slowdown affects commodity exporters, manufacturers, shipping companies, financial markets, and governments relying on Chinese demand.
The world’s second-largest economy is still expanding.
The question is whether it can keep growing without forcing households to spend more and addressing the property crisis that continues dragging confidence down.
6. China and North Korea moved closer together
Senior Chinese and North Korean officials held another round of high-level meetings as Beijing and Pyongyang accelerated cooperation.
Xi Jinping urged both countries to maintain “strategic resolve” amid global instability. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un later met Wang Huning, one of China’s highest-ranking political officials.
The two governments pledged stronger political, economic, cultural, and strategic coordination. Kim also reaffirmed support for Beijing’s “One China” position regarding Taiwan.
This matters because North Korea is not acting in isolation.
Its missile program, nuclear arsenal, relationship with Russia, and military pressure on South Korea and Japan increasingly sit inside a wider network of cooperation among governments resisting U.S. influence.
China may not support every North Korean provocation.
It values North Korea as a strategic buffer and partner.
The closer the relationship becomes, the harder it will be to pressure Pyongyang without also negotiating with Beijing.
7. Israel and Lebanon moved toward “pilot zones” while the larger conflict remained unresolved
Israeli and Lebanese representatives completed another round of U.S.-brokered negotiations in Rome.
The talks focused on establishing “pilot zones” in southern Lebanon where Lebanese forces would deploy, armed groups would be disarmed, and Israeli troops would gradually withdraw.
The framework could become a pathway toward reducing violence after the war between Israel and Hezbollah.
But the central dispute remains.
Lebanon demands Israeli withdrawal.
Israel says it will not fully withdraw while Hezbollah remains armed.
Hezbollah rejects disarmament without broader political and regional guarantees.
That means each side is being asked to act first while fearing the other side will not follow.
The pilot-zone approach attempts to reduce that risk by testing the arrangement in smaller areas before expanding it.
It is not peace.
It is an effort to determine whether peace is operationally possible.
8. Venezuela’s earthquake death toll rose—and the response came under scrutiny
The official death toll from Venezuela’s June earthquakes rose to 4,734 by July 14.
Thousands more were injured or displaced, and the real toll may remain incomplete as crews continue identifying victims and examining damaged areas.
New reporting found that delayed orders, confused chains of command, equipment shortages, and overlapping authority slowed the military’s initial response.
Civilians and international rescue teams reportedly led some early rescue efforts before organized military assistance fully arrived.
The government says it deployed quickly.
Witnesses and insiders described a more chaotic picture.
The difference matters because the first hours after a major earthquake are the survival window.
Venezuela’s crisis was not caused only by seismic force.
It exposed what happens when aging infrastructure, weak public institutions, economic collapse, communications failures, and politicized chains of command collide with a natural disaster.
9. Cuba’s national grid collapsed for the third time in nine days
Cuba’s electrical grid suffered its third nationwide collapse in nine days on July 14.
Approximately 10 million people were affected.
Traffic lights failed.
Generators filled Havana with noise.
Water systems struggled because pumps require electricity.
Families avoided storing food because refrigerators could not be trusted to stay on.
Cuba’s government blames U.S. economic pressure and fuel restrictions.
Critics also point to decades of underinvestment, deteriorating power plants, centralized mismanagement, and a government unable to maintain essential infrastructure.
Both can be true.
Sanctions and fuel shortages worsen the crisis.
The Cuban state has failed to build a resilient system capable of protecting its population from those pressures.
A power grid is the infrastructure beneath every other infrastructure.
When it repeatedly collapses, hospitals, food, water, transportation, communications, and public order all begin failing with it.
10. Congo’s Ebola outbreak grew while patients and responders fled an attacked hospital
The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo approached 2,000 confirmed cases and more than 700 deaths by mid-July.
Then an angry crowd attacked a hospital treating Ebola patients.
Patients and health workers fled.
The incident joined a larger pattern of mistrust, violence, underfunding, delayed treatment, and community resistance disrupting containment.
The risk is not limited to the hospital.
The United Nations warned that transporting the bodies of Ebola victims between districts could spread infection because the virus remains highly transmissible after death. A large share of deaths have occurred outside formal medical facilities, making safe burial and contact tracing more difficult.
This outbreak uses the Bundibugyo strain, complicating treatment and vaccination.
The medical tools matter.
Trust matters just as much.
An outbreak cannot be contained when people fear the responders, attack the hospitals, move contagious bodies, or remain invisible to the surveillance system.
What connects these 20 stories
At first glance, these events look unrelated.
A Senate vacancy.
An ICE shooting.
An inflation report.
A Cuban blackout.
A Chinese slowdown.
A Congolese outbreak.
A Venezuelan earthquake.
A war over shipping lanes.
But the underlying question is the same:
What happens when systems are placed under pressure?
Does government tell the truth?
Does leadership transfer cleanly?
Do agencies obey limits?
Does infrastructure hold?
Do officials release records?
Do emergency plans exist before the emergency?
Do the people carrying the cost have any meaningful power over the decision?
The biggest stories are rarely only the events themselves.
They are tests.
The Iran war tests executive power and military restraint.
Graham’s succession tests whether temporary appointment becomes inheritance.
McConnell’s absence tests whether representation can exist without presence.
The election purge tests the line between security and control.
The ICE killings test whether enforcement has outrun accountability.
Inflation tests whether relief can survive another geopolitical shock.
The wildfires and floods test infrastructure built for a climate that no longer exists.
Ukraine tests whether Europe can prepare for a peace Russia may not respect.
China tests whether an export machine can thrive while households remain weak.
Venezuela, Cuba, and Congo test what happens when public institutions reach a crisis already exhausted.
That is why I do this work.
Not just to repeat the headline.
To show the structure beneath it.
What to watch next
The next few days may be even more consequential.
Watch whether the U.S.-Iran strikes continue after American fatalities.
Watch for details about the missing service member and the attack in Jordan.
Watch whether Trump seeks new congressional authorization—or continues without it.
Watch whether Darline Graham officially enters the Senate race.
Watch whether McConnell announces a return date.
Watch who replaces the Election Assistance Commission members.
Watch the investigations into ICE’s use of deadly force.
Watch the Supreme Court’s response in the Venezuelan TPS case.
Watch whether wildfire smoke clears enough for the World Cup final between Argentina and Spain in New Jersey.
Watch whether China announces new stimulus.
Watch whether Ukraine’s cabinet changes produce further protests.
Watch whether Congo’s Ebola outbreak crosses more borders.
And watch the Strait of Hormuz.
Because a narrow channel of water now sits beneath the price of energy, the direction of the war, and the stability of economies far beyond the Middle East.
SPECIAL ACCESS & SUPPORT THIS WORK
I am keeping this entire article free.
I also need to be honest.
I started a demanding package-delivery job because this publication has not yet become financially sustainable enough for me to do full time.
I am not naming the company right now. I may write about the experience later, once I have enough firsthand understanding to do it properly.
The job has taken time and energy away from publishing.
I do not want that to become permanent.
We are currently at 324 paid subscribers.
Tonight’s goal is 330.
We need six more paid subscribers.
If you can afford to subscribe, I genuinely need the support more than ever right now.
Your subscription funds the investigations, sourcing, timelines, record searches, follow-ups, ebooks, and long-form work that cannot be produced between delivery stops forever.
I will be posting much more today and throughout the coming days to make up for the gap.
Subscribe:
All links:
https://linktr.ee/HoldingTheTorch
Gumroad archive and current deals:
https://iholdthetorch.gumroad.com
Shortform offer:
If six people reading this become paid subscribers tonight, we reach 330.
If you can be one of them, thank you.
Sources
Reporting used for this roundup includes Reuters, the Associated Press, official government statements, the U.S. military, state election authorities, and public-health agencies. Each section above distinguishes confirmed reporting from open questions and developing claims. For direct sources message me, thank you for reading 💕